‘We Had No Choice’: Ukrainian Troops Open Up About Kursk Withdrawal

BBC:Image

In the frigid borderlands between Ukraine and Russia, where strategic calculations meet human endurance, Ukrainian forces have reluctantly relinquished their hard-won positions in Russia’s Kursk region. The decision, as revealed through exclusive interviews with frontline commanders, illustrates the brutal arithmetic of modern warfare where tactical advantages must be weighed against sustainable military positioning.

“We accomplished our mission we showed we could strike deep, we tied up their forces, we recovered prisoners,” explains Captain Andriy Kovalenko, his weathered face a map of exhaustion and resolve. “But holding territory inside Russia indefinitely? That was never the objective.”

The three-month incursion into Russian territory an audacious move that shocked military analysts achieved multiple strategic goals: disrupting Russian offensive planning, forcing redeployment of troops from other fronts, and demonstrating Ukraine’s capacity to bring the fight to Russian soil.

Yet as winter approached, supply lines stretched thin and Russian forces intensified counter-operations, the calculus shifted. Ukrainian command prioritized preserving combat effectiveness over maintaining symbolic territorial gains.

“People see withdrawal and think defeat,” notes Lieutenant Oleksandr Bondarenko. “What they don’t see is the strategic repositioning. Sometimes taking a step back allows you to prepare for two steps forward.”

For Ukraine’s military leadership, the Kursk operation represents not an abandoned objective but a completed mission a temporary incursion that served its purpose in the broader framework of a conflict where territorial control fluctuates but strategic momentum endures.